What does Tannenbaum & Schmidt Continuum Theory say?


In the past few decades, many leadership gurus came up with different definitions of leadership styles. Out of those theories, many of them are based on task – relationship characteristics. In 1938, Lewin and Lippitt proposed classifications of leaders based on how much involvement leaders placed into task and relationship needs.

Almost after four decades, in 1973, Tannenbaum & Schmidt came up with a continuum of earlier studies with range of leadership behaviors, ranging from manager-centered (task) to subordinate-centered (relationship).

Tannenbaum and Schmidt Continuum model shows the relationship between the levels of freedom that a manager chooses to give to a team, and the level of authority used by the manager. As we already discussed in Situational leadership, number of parameters goes into choosing the managerial style: manager’s competence, subordinate’s developmental level, the situation.

Based on the above parameters, level of delegation takes any one of the seven levels as depicted by the central arrow line.

tannenbaum schmidt continuum theory model
Tannenbaum & Schmidt concentrated more on delegation & freedom in decision making to subordinates and there by on the team development. As the team’s freedom increases, the manager’s authority decreases. This is a positive way for both teams and managers to develop. We already dealt delegating in  a different blog post.

Tannenbaum & Schmidt defined 7 levels of delegated freedom which moves from manager-oriented to subordinate-oriented. As team develops, level moves from one to the next – the area of freedom increases and the need for manager’s intervention decreases. Following levels are self-explanatory and easy to understand:

1. Manager takes decision and announces it – only manager plays the decision-making role; no team involvement

2. Manager decides and then “Sells” his decision to the team – no change in decision; but team may raise some concerns

3. Manager presents decision with background ideas for the decision and invite questions – team knows what options manager considered for his decision; more team involvement

4. Manager suggests provisional decision & invites discussion regarding the decision – team can have a say on manager’s decision; it can be changed based on discussion

5. Manager presents the problem or situation, get suggestions, then decides – team is free to come up with options; manager decides on those options

6. Manager explains the situation or problem, defines the parameters and asks team to decide on the solution – manager delegated whole thing to the team; but still manager is accountable for the outcome

7. Manager allows team to develop options and decide on the action, within the manager’s received limit – complete freedom level; team does all the work almost as what the manager does at level 1.

The main advantage of this theory: for leaders/managers – it defines the criteria for involvement and delegation & range of choices for the involvement.

 

Update on 08/16/2011 – Added Google Doc Presentation of this Article:

3 thoughts on “What does Tannenbaum & Schmidt Continuum Theory say?

  1. Pingback: Forming Storming Norming Performing Developmental Model | Your story is our story, let us sing together.

  2. I am doing a master’s degree program on management with a paper due on leadership, the continuum theory is helpful. I am very grateful for this detailed version the continuum theory

  3. thank you for this wonderful and practical leadership convention. i am, petrush g. macute – motivational speaker. this will help a lot of organizations. GOD bless.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s